Judging Criteria

The World Brand Design Society Awards (WBDS Awards) judging criteria measure and evaluates nine broad but distinct areas that separately and collectively distinguish and benchmark corporate and consumer brand design excellence.

Evaluation Process

Earning a WBDS Award is a rigorous journey marked by a demanding two-stage selection process. In the initial stage, the editorial team conducts the evaluation, followed by an assessment by highly accomplished judges. With an ever-increasing number of participants each year, only the most outstanding submissions will earn the honorary WBDS Awards recognition.

 

Our judging criteria establishes a structured framework for assessment, recognising that not all criteria apply universally to each design entry. The entire editorial team and our esteemed panel of judges are unwaveringly committed to upholding impartiality and ensuring a fair evaluation, even when specific criteria may not be applicable. Furthermore, judges and editors have the authority to flag entries for reevaluation and further consideration.

Points and Ranking

The ten judging criteria each carry the potential to earn a maximum of 10 points, resulting in a total possible score of 100 points. The more judging points you accumulate, the higher the value of your award. These award points also contribute to your standing in the Global Agency Design Ranking league table.

 

Is the visual presentation engaging, is there immediate contextual clarity in the visual communication, and is the overall presentation at a high professional standard? Entries will be marked down for bad imagery, i.e. bad photography; if there is an over-reliance on photoshop mock-ups throughout a presentation; if CAD is unfinished, unedited, and not a realistic representation.

1. Visual Presentation
Engaging, Visual Journey 
and Visual Communication


Is the written case study engaging? Is there contextual clarity in what has been presented? Does the text describe the project journey, i.e. from brief to insight, the size of the opportunity, market, the challenges, the design process, the final solution, and the results of what has been delivered? Is the case study text written at a high professional standard?

2. Written Presentation
Engaging, Journey and Written Communication


3. Purpose
Intent, Reasoning and Clarity

Does the project have a purpose and substance? Is there clarity in the work's purpose, reasoning and goals? i.e. achieving strategic marketing goals, surpassing financial targets, a need for improving overall user experiences, a focus on return on design investment, or delivering upon organisational social impact aims. Has the entry provided supportive evidence and reasoning for the brief in line with the proposal presented?


How relevant is the delivered solution in relation to who or what it represents, i.e. from a societal, cultural, behavioural, market, brand, product, or service perspective? Does the final solution justify its existence and clearly communicate its relevance?

4. Relevance
Relevance, Justification 
and Written Communication


The value creation of imaginative idea/s; utilising craft, originality, 
explorative playfulness, tickled by humorous wit, being emotionally 
wowed, and charmed by intelligence. From conservative small to 
the game-changing big, we are looking for ideas that captivate, 
provoke, push boundaries, take risks, and for work that moves 
people yet are still relevant and purposeful. Is there any value 
creation, is it original, and has an intelligent solution been 
presented?

5. Creativity
Originality, Creative Intelligence 
and Value Creation


The value creation of imaginative idea/s; through the development and implementation of products, materials, processes, or services to improve functionality, efficiency, effectiveness or to create a competitive advantage. Is the successful exploitation of a new idea/s considered inventive or innovative? Is there a perceived and contributed added commercial value to what has been presented?

6. Innovation
Originality, Innovative 
and Value Creation


What are the overall delivery quality, implementation, and final design execution? These deliverables may include; artwork, print, materials, models, engineering, systems, operations, experiences, products and services. Has the overall delivery done justice to the creative idea or solution? Has the product or service's final delivery, implementation or execution contributed to adding value?

7. Delivery
Implementation, Execution 
and Value Creation


Creating a tangible and non-tangible experience requires understanding how to provide a founding framework for human behaviour to reside and experience. A series of touchpoints and interactions that, when put together, evoked sensations, feelings, cognitions, and behavioural responses by brand-driven experience. Has the proposal presented provided a meaningful and relevant framework and touchpoints that could be considered a valuable brand experience?

8. Experience
Touchpoints, Interactions 
and Meaning


9. Society
Human-Centred Design, Sustainable Endeavours and Society

Design should consider a more comprehensive and social perspective by addressing human-centred related issues and global challenges that affect everyone, everywhere. Is the work presented attempting to make a difference by designing for broader societal needs?


Judges are granted a platform to assert their authority and render a final verdict, a pivotal step when the work in question has been singled out for review. Within this process, judges exercise their discretion to meticulously evaluate the award's merit and, accordingly, confer distinctions like Black, Gold, Silver, Bronze, or Commended, which encapsulate the award's overall value.

10. Judges Opinion
An opportunity for judges to exercise
their authority and render a final verdict.


 
 

Judging & Ranking Points

 

The World Brand Design Society Global Agency Design Ranking is a comprehensive representation of the top agencies in the global consumer and corporate brand design arena.

This ranking has been compiled independently from the most remarkable agencies and projects, which were formerly known as Notable Agencies and Works but have now evolved into the prestigious World Brand Design Society Awards (WBDS Awards) and the Global Agency Design Ranking. This worldwide ranking league table is exclusively dedicated to design agencies and studios specialising in consumer and corporate brand design.

Judging points correspond to both award placements (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) and distinctions like Black, Gold, Silver, Bronze, and Commended. These award placements and distinctions contribute to your ranking points, ultimately affecting your position on the Global Agency Design Ranking league table.

 
 

VALUES

POINTS

The meaning behind the values

Judging points and trophy Mark value


1st, 2nd and 3rd Place
80-100 Judging Points
Additional Ranking Points

Distinction 
The 1st, 2nd and 3rd places are distinction awards given by the editors. These works are normally Black or Gold Awarded works that standout above the rest and deserve a mention of distinction.


Black
90-100 Judging Points
5 Ranking Points

Excellence 
The Black Award represents the pinnacle of excellence in corporate or consumer brand design, setting the standard for creative achievement and being at the forefront of the field.


Mastery 
The Gold Award celebrates exceptional creative mastery, highlighting work that demonstrates a profound understanding of the craft and a remarkable ability to innovate.

Gold
80-89 Judging Points
4 Ranking Points


Remarkable 
The Silver Award recognises work that are truly remarkable, representing outstanding achievements in branding and design that captivate and leave a lasting impact.

Silver
70-79 Judging Points
3 Ranking Points


Notable
The Bronze Award celebrates notable creative ingenuity, showcasing work that stands out as a notable achievement in the corporate and consumer brand design.

Bronze
60-69 Judging Points
2 Ranking Points


Aspiring
The Commended Award acknowledges the potential and promise in emerging corporate and consumer brand design work, commending competent work and an aspiring effort.

Commended
50-59 Judging Points
1 Ranking Points